SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
(Amendment No.__)No. )

Filed by the Registrant [X]

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [_]

Check the appropriate box:

[_] Preliminary proxy statement [X]Proxy Statement [_] Confidential, for useUse of the
Commission onlyOnly (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

[X] Definitive proxy statementProxy Statement

[_] Definitive additional materialsAdditional Materials

[_] Soliciting material pursuantMaterial Pursuant to Rule 14a-12(S)240.14a-11(c) or (S)240.14a-12

BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
------------------------
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------N/A
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

[X] No fee required.required

[_] $125 per Exchange Act Rules 0-11(c)(1)(ii), or 14a-6(i)(1), or 14a-6(i)(2)
or Item 22(a)(2) of Schedule 14A.

[_] $500 per each party to the controversy pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 14a-
6(i)(3).

[_] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.

(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set(Set forth the amount on which the
filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

(5) Total fee paid:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

[_] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

[_] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was
paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement
number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1) Amount Previously Paid:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

(3) Filing Party:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

(4) Date Filed:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY, INC.

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held on May 23, 2000
_____________3, 2001

--------------

To The Stockholders:

The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of BioLase Technology, Inc. (the
"Company") will be held at the Company's offices, 981 Calle Amanecer, San
Clemente, California 92673, on May 23, 2000,3, 2001, at 2:00 p.m. for the following
purposes:

1. To elect four directors to serve until the next Annual Meeting of
Stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and
qualified;

2. To approve an amendment to the 1998 Stock Option Plan increasing
the number of authorized shares of Common Stock reserved under
the Plan from 1,000,000 to 2,000,000 shares;

3. To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the
Company's independent public accountants for the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2000;2001; and

3.4. To transact such other business as may properly come before the
Annual Meeting and any adjournments thereof.

The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business, March 31, 2000,5, 2001,
as the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of
and to vote at the Annual Meeting.

You are cordially invited to attend the meeting in person. However,
whether or not you plan to attend, we urge you to complete, date, sign and
return the enclosed proxy card without delay in the accompanying envelope (to
which no postage need be affixed if mailed in the United States) so that your
shares may be represented at the Annual Meeting.

FEDERICO PIGNATELLI
Chairman

April 18, 20005, 2001

BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
981 Calle Amanecer
San Clemente, California 92673

__________----------

PROXY STATEMENT

__________----------

GENERAL INFORMATION

Solicitation, Revocation and Voting of Proxies

This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of
proxies by the Board of Directors of BioLase Technology, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), in connection with the Annual Meetingannual meeting of
Stockholdersstockholders (the "Annual Meeting") to be held at 2:00 p.m. on May 23, 2000,3, 2001, at
the Company's offices, 981 Calle Amanecer, San Clemente, California, 92673, and
at any and all adjournments thereof. It is anticipated that this Proxy Statement
and accompanying proxy will first be mailed to stockholders on or about April 21, 2000.5,
2001.

The accompanying proxy, if properly executed and returned, will be voted
as specified by the stockholder or, if no vote is indicated, the proxy will be
voted FOR all proposals. As to any other matter of business which may be brought
before the Annual Meeting, a vote may be cast pursuant to the accompanying proxy
in accordance with the judgment of the persons voting the same, but management
does not know of any such other matter of business. A stockholder may revoke his
or her proxy at any time prior to the voting of shares by voting in person at
the Annual Meeting or by filing with the Secretary of the Company a duly
executed proxy bearing a later date or an instrument revoking the proxy.

The costs of solicitation of proxies will be paid by the Company. In
addition to soliciting proxies by mail, the Company's officers, directors and
other regular employees, without additional compensation, may solicit proxies
personally or by other appropriate means. Banks, brokers, fiduciaries and other
custodians and nominees who forward proxy soliciting material to their
principals will be reimbursed for their customary and reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses.

Record Date and Voting Rights

Only stockholders of record of the Company's Common Stockcommon stock, $0.001 par
value (the "Common Stock") as of the close of business on March 31, 20005, 2001 will be
entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. On that date, there were outstanding
19,524,85219,475,722 shares of Common Stock, which constituted all of the outstanding
voting securities of the Company, each of which is entitled to one vote per
share. A majority of the shares entitled to vote, represented in person or by
proxy, constitutes a quorum at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions and broker
non-votes are counted as present for purposes of determining the existence of a
quorum. 1The election of directors, the approval of an amendment to the 1998
Stock Option Plan and the ratification of the

-1-

independent public accountants require the affirmative vote of holders
representing a majority of the shares of Common Stock present in person or by
proxy at a meeting at which a quorum is present.

Dissenters' Rights

Under Delaware law, stockholders are not entitled to any dissenters'
rights with respect to the approval of any of the proposals described in this
Proxy Statement.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF COMMON STOCKCERTAIN BENEFICIAL
OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth certain information as of March 31, 2000,9, 2001,
relating to the beneficial ownership of the Company's Common Stock by (1) all
persons known by the Company to beneficially own more than 5% of the outstanding
shares, (2) each director
and Named Executive Officer of the Company, and (3)(2) all executive officers and
directors of the Company as a group. To the Company's knowledge, no person
beneficially owns more than 5% of the outstanding shares. Unless otherwise
indicated, the address of each person listed is the same as that of the Company,
i.e., 981 Calle Amanecer, San Clemente, California 92673.

Number of Shares Percent
Name Beneficially Owned (1) of Class
---- ------------------------------------------- --------

Federico Pignatelli 541,250 2.73%596,250 3.01%
George V. d'Arbeloff 104,017134,017 *
Jeffrey W. Jones 181,000 *424,000 2.14%
William A. Owens 45,00074,500 *
Keith G. Bateman 52,000127,350 *
All Executive Officers and Directors
as a Group (7 persons) 1,263,267 6.16%

Advisor's Capital Investments, Inc. 1,512,894 (2) 7.75%
17 Tripp Road
Woodstock, CT 062811,696,117 8.13%

_____________- -------------

* Less than 1%.

(1) Includes shares issuable under options which are exercisable on or
within 60 days of March 31, 20009, 2001 as follows: Mr. Pignatelli - 273,750303,750
shares; Mr. d'Arbeloff - 85,835115,835 shares; Mr. Jones - 176,000419,000 shares; Mr.
Owens - 45,00074,500 shares; Mr. Bateman - 50,000125,000 shares; and a total of
970,5851,378,085 shares for all executive officers and directors as a group.

(2) Based on a Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on February 16, 1999. Advisor's Capital Investments, a registered
investment adviser, disclaims beneficial ownership of 1,437,894 shares as
to which it does not have the sole or shared power to vote or direct the
vote, but does have the shared power to dispose or direct the disposition.

PROPOSAL ONE - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The four directors to be elected at the Annual Meeting will hold office
until the next Annual Meetingannual meeting of Stockholdersstockholders and until the election of their
respective successors. The nominees receivingelection of each nominee as a director requires the
highest numberaffirmative vote of affirmative votes, up
to the numberholders of a majority of the Common Stock present in
person or by proxy at a meeting at which a quorum is present. Votes

-2-

against the directors to be elected, will be elected directors. Broker
non-votes and votes withheld have no legal effect. All proxies
received by the Board of Directors will be voted for the nominees listed below
if no direction to the contrary is given. The nominees are currently members of
the Board of Directors and have agreed to continue to serve if elected. In the
event that any nominee is unable or declines to serve, an event that is not
anticipated, the proxies will be voted for the election of any nominee who may
be designated by the Board of Directors.

The nominees for director are:

Name Age Director Since
---- --- --------------

Federico Pignatelli 47 1991
George V. d'Arbeloff 55 1996
Jeffrey W. Jones 43Name Age Director Since
----- --- --------------
Federico Pignatelli 48 1991
George V. d'Arbeloff 56 1996
Jeffrey W. Jones 44 1998
William A. Owens 60 1998
William A. Owens 59 1998

Mr. Pignatelli has served as the Company's Chairman of the Board of
Directors since 1994. Since 1995, he has served as Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of Studio Management, Inc., the general partner of Pier
59 Studio, L.P., a limited partnership that operates in New York City and the
world's largest complex of professional photographic and digital studios.
Since
1992 Mr. Pignatelli has also been President of EuroCapital Partners, Inc., an
investment banking firm. Mr. Pignatelli is a director of Fountain Powerboat
Industries, Inc., a high performance sport powerboat and sport fishing boat
manufacturer listed on the Nasdaq National Market System. From 1990 to 1992,Previously, Mr. Pignatelli was associated with Gruntal & Company, an investment
banking firm
and brokerage firm, as a Managing Director. Previously, Mr. Pignatelli was
associatedDirector and also with Ladenburg,
Thalmann & Co., a New York investment banking and brokerage firm, as a Managing
Director.

Mr. d'Arbeloff has served as the Chief Executive Officer of Retail
Solutions, Inc., a company involved in the development and marketing of
inventory control and scanning-based computer systems for retail stores, since
1996. From 1967 to 1996, he served in various executive capacities with
Teradyne, Inc., a manufacturer of testing equipment for the semiconductor and
electronics industries, including Vice President of Corporate Relations from
1995 to 1996, Vice President and General Manager of the Semiconductor Test Group
from 1992 to 1995 and Vice President and General Manager of the
Industrial/Consumer Division of the Semiconductor Test Group from 1982 to 1992.

Mr. Jones has been President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company
since 1998. From 1986 until he joined the Company, Mr. Jones served in various
executive capacities, including president and chief executive officer, with HGM
Medical Lasers (and certain related 3
entities), a Salt Lake City-based
manufacturer of medical lasers utilized in ophthalmologic, dental and anesthetic
applications.

Admiral Owens is Co-Chief Executive Officer (since 1999) and Vice
Chairman (since 1998) of Teledesic LLC, a company engaged in developing a
satellite communications network. He also serves as Chief Executive Officer of
an affiliated company, Teledesic Holdings Ltd. Admiral Owens was President,
Chief Operating Officer and Vice Chairman of Science Applications International
Corporation, a high-technology company, from 1996 until 1998. Admiral Owens
retired from the U.S. Navy in 1996 after 34 years of service. During his naval
career, his positions included Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the
nation's second-rankingsecond-

-3-

ranking military officer (1993-1996); Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for
Resources, Warfare Requirements and Assessments (1991-1993); Commander of the
U.S. Sixth Fleet (1990-1991); and senior military assistant to the Office of the
Secretary of State (1988-1991). Admiral Owens also serves as a director of
British American Tobacco (Holding Ltd.), Viasat Inc. and Microvision, Inc.

Information Concerning Board of Directors and Committee Meetings

The Company's Board of Directors held one meetingtwo meetings during 1999fiscal year 2000 and
also acted by written consent several27 times. George d'Arbeloff and Federico
Pignatelli are the membersAll directors attended at least 75% of
the Compensation Committeeaggregate of the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors and the
Audit
Committee.total number of meetings of the committees on which they served. The Company
does not have a nominating committee.

The Compensation Committee approves the compensation of employees whose
annual salary equals or exceeds $60,000 and also administers and generally
approves option grants under the Company's stock option plans. George d'Arbeloff
and Federico Pignatelli are the members of the Compensation Committee. During
1999,fiscal year 2000, the Compensation Committee held one meeting.

The Audit Committee assistsreviews the Company's financial reporting process,
its system of internal controls, its audit process and its process for
monitoring compliance with laws and regulations. It also recommends the
selection of the independent auditors to the Board of Directors. Each of the
three Audit Committee members satisfies the definition of independent director
as established in the NASDAQ Listing Standards. Each member also satisfies the
requirements of the NASDAQ Listing Standards regarding financial skill. At least
one member of the Audit Committee has accounting or related financial management
expertise. On February 26, 2001, the Board of Directors in selecting independent auditorsadopted a written
charter for the Audit Committee, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A to
auditthis Proxy Statement. William Owens, Federico Pignatelli and George d'Arbeloff
are the Company's financial
statements, reviews the audit with the auditors and management, and consults
with the auditors and management regarding risk management and the adequacymembers of the Company's financial and accounting procedures and controls.Audit Committee. The Audit Committee met once in 1999.fiscal
year 2000.

Audit Committee Report

The Audit Committee has reviewed the audited consolidated financial
statements of the Company doesand discussed such statements with management. The
Audit Committee has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP ("PWC"), the
Company's independent accountants during fiscal year 2000, the matters required
to be discussed by Statement of Auditing Standards No. 61.

The Audit Committee received from PWC the written disclosures required
by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 and discussed with PWC its
independence.

Based on the review and discussions noted above, the Audit Committee
recommended to the Board of Directors that the Company's audited consolidated
financial statements be included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000, and be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). The Audit Committee also recommended to the
Board of Directors the selection of PWC to serve as the Company's outside
auditors for fiscal year 2001.

-4-

This report of the Audit Committee shall not have a nominating committee.be deemed incorporated by
reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this Proxy
Statement into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the
Company specifically incorporates this information by reference, and shall not
otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.

AUDIT COMMITTEE:

William Owens

Federico Pignatelli

George d'Arbeloff

Directors' Compensation

The Company's directors do not receive cash directors' fees, but are
reimbursed for business expenses incurred in connection with their duties as
directors. Under the Company's 19991998 Stock Option Plan, each non-employee
director is automatically granted a ten-year option to purchase 30,000 shares of
Common Stock on the date he is first elected a director and on the date of each annual meeting of stockholders at which he is
reelected,elected, or a proportional number thereof if such director is first elected on a
date other than at an annual meeting of stockholders, at an exercise price equal
to the market price of the Common Stock on that date. The options vest at the
rate of 7,500 shares per quarter.quarter if granted on the date of the annual meeting.
Otherwise, they vest at a rate of 2,500 shares per month. Pursuant to this plan,the 1998
Stock Option Plan, on May 25, 199923, 2000 Messrs. d'Arbeloff, Pignatelli and Owens were
each granted options to purchase 30,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise
price of $2.03125$2.125 per share.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the
Company's directors, executive officers and greater than 10% stockholders to
file reports of ownership (Form 3) and changes in ownership (Forms 4 and 5) with
the SEC and to furnish the Company with copies of all such forms which they file
with the SEC.

The Company believes that during fiscal year 2000 all required reports
were timely filed by its directors, executive officers and greater than 10%
stockholders except that each director, Jeffrey W. Jones and Keith G. Bateman
filed a late Form 5. In making the foregoing disclosures, the Company has relied
solely on its review of copies of forms filed by such persons with the SEC.

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote "FOR" the proposal to
elect the nominees to the Board of Directors.

-5-

PROPOSAL TWO - AMENDMENT TO 1998
STOCK OPTION PLAN

Background of the Plan

The Company's 1998 Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") was originally adopted
by the Board of Directors on November 17, 1998 and approved by the Company's
stockholders on May 25, 1999. The Plan originally reserved 1,000,000 shares of
Common Stock for issuance as stock awards or upon the exercise of options
granted pursuant to the Plan. The Plan provides that it may be administered by
either the Board of Directors or a committee of at least two directors appointed
by the Board of Directors. If a committee is appointed, the Board of Directors,
instead of that committee, may at any time take any action permitted to be taken
by such committee under the Plan. The Plan is currently administered by the
Compensation Committee (the "Committee") which consists of Federico Pignatelli
and George d'Arbeloff. Subject to the limitations set forth in the Plan, the
Committee has the authority to determine to whom options or stock awards will be
granted; to determine the terms and conditions of such awards; to modify or
waive any restrictions of any awards; to accelerate the vesting of awards; and
to establish rules and regulations that it deems appropriate for the
administration of the Plan.

The Plan provides for the granting of options or restricted or
unrestricted stock awards to non-employee directors, employees, consultants and
advisors of the Company. Options may be either "incentive stock options"
("Incentive Options") as defined by Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended (the "Code"), or options that do not so qualify ("Nonqualified
Options"). The potential number of participants in the Plan is 7 officers and
directors, 83 employees, and any consultants or advisors who perform services
for the Company. The exact number of options or shares of restricted or
unrestricted stock to be granted to any single individual or class of
individuals is within the discretion of the Committee and is not determinable.
Only employees are eligible for the grant of Incentive Options.

Automatic Option Grants to Non-employee Directors

The Plan provides for the automatic grant on the date of each annual
meeting of stockholders to each non-employee director who is elected at such
meeting, of Nonqualified Options to purchase 30,000 shares of Common Stock. Each
such option vests at the rate of 7,500 shares per quarter, beginning three
months after the grant date. Any non-employee director who is first elected a
director at any time other than at an annual meeting of stockholders will
automatically be granted an option on the date of his election as a director for
a number of shares determined by multiplying 2,500 times the number of full
months remaining until the next June 1, which option will vest at the rate of
2,500 shares per month beginning on the last day of the first full month
following the grant date. The exercise price per share will be equal to 100% of
the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date of grant. Non-employee
directors may not receive more than one automatic option grant per year under
the Plan, but they are eligible to receive other awards under the Plan. George
V. d'Arbeloff, William A. Owens and Federico Pignatelli are currently the only
non-employee directors of the Company.

-6-

Terms and Conditions of Options

Options granted under the Plan expire on such date as is determined by
the Committee, unless earlier terminated as provided in the Plan, but in no
event later than ten years after the grant date (five years with respect to
Incentive Options granted to an optionee who owns or would be considered to own
more than 10% of the outstanding Common Stock of the Company or any subsidiary
on the grant date).

An option may be exercisable in installments as determined on the grant
date by the Committee. The exercise price for options is determined by the
Committee at the time of grant, subject to the following: (1) the exercise price
of an Incentive Option may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the
Common Stock on the grant date (110% of the fair market value in the case of
Incentive Options granted to a person who on the grant date owns or is
considered to own more than 10% of the outstanding Common Stock); and (2) the
exercise price of a Non-qualified Option may not be less than 85% of the fair
market value of the Common Stock on the grant date. If the aggregate fair market
value (determined at the time each Incentive Option is granted) of Common Stock
for which all Incentive Options held by an optionee (whether granted under the
Plan or any other plan of the Company) are exercisable for the first time during
any calendar year exceeds $100,000, the amount of such excess will be treated as
a Non-qualified Option.

The exercise price of an option is payable in cash or, with the approval
of the Committee, in shares of Common Stock that have been owned by the optionee
for at least six months, by full recourse promissory note secured by the shares
purchased, by cancellation of indebtedness of the Company to the optionee, by
waiver of compensation due or accrued for services rendered, or through a same
day sale arranged through a broker.

If an optionee ceases to be employed or retained by the Company for any
reason other than death or permanent disability (as defined in the Plan), the
option generally expires on the earlier of three months from the date of such
termination or expiration of the term of the option. During the period between
the optionee's termination and expiration of the option, the option may only be
exercised to the extent that it was exercisable on the date of such termination.
Upon the death or permanent disability of an optionee while an employee,
director, consultant or advisor, the option generally expires on the earlier of
one year from the date of death or three months from the date of permanent
disability or expiration of the term of the option, but can be exercised only to
the extent that it could have been exercised on the date of death or permanent
disability. The foregoing provisions regarding termination of options upon
termination of employment, permanent disability or death may be varied by the
Committee.

Restricted and Unrestricted Stock Awards

The Committee may grant restricted stock awards which specify the number
of shares of Common Stock to be issued to the participant, the price, if any, to
be paid for such shares by the participant and the restrictions imposed on such
shares. The Committee may grant restricted stock awards subject to the
attainment of specified performance goals, continued employment or such other
limitations or restrictions as the Committee may determine. Shares of restricted
stock may be issued immediately upon grant or upon vesting as determined by the
Committee. If

-7-

shares which are subject to vesting or other restrictions or conditions are
issued immediately upon grant, the Committee may require the participant to
deliver an executed stock power, endorsed in blank, relating to such shares. The
Committee may also require that the stock certificates evidencing such shares be
held in custody by the Company until the restrictions on them have lapsed.

The Committee may make awards of unrestricted Common Stock to
participants in connection with services actually rendered by such persons.
Unrestricted shares issued on a bonus basis may be issued for no cash
consideration.

Transferability of Awards

Awards granted under the Plan are not transferable or assignable other
than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. The Committee may
permit Non-qualified Options to be transferred pursuant to a domestic relations
order or to members of the optionee's immediate family, charitable institutions,
or trusts or other entities whose beneficiaries or beneficial owners are members
of the optionees' immediate family and/or charitable institutions, pursuant to
such conditions and procedures as the Committee may establish.

Duration and Modification of the Plan

The Plan will remain in effect until all shares covered by awards
granted under the Plan have been purchased or all rights to acquire the shares
have lapsed. No awards may be granted under the Plan after November 17, 2008,
although the Board of Directors may terminate the granting of awards under the
Plan at an earlier date or may amend or otherwise modify the Plan.

Federal Income Tax Consequences

The following discussion is only a summary of certain significant United
States federal income tax consequences of the Plan based on currently applicable
provisions of the Code and the regulations promulgated thereon.

Options. In general, an optionee realizes no income upon the grant of
-------
Incentive Options. The amount paid by the optionee for the Common Stock received
pursuant to the exercise of Incentive Options will generally constitute his or
her basis (or cost) for tax purposes. The holding period for such Common Stock
generally begins on the date the optionee exercises Incentive Options. Although
no current taxable income is realized upon the exercise of Incentive Options,
the excess of the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date of exercise
of the Incentive Option over the option price is an item of income for purposes
of the alternative minimum tax. As such, the exercise of Incentive Options may
result in the optionee being subject to the alternative minimum tax for the year
during which Incentive Options are exercised. In general, an optionee that
receives a Nonqualified Option realizes ordinary compensation income either at
the date of grant or at the date of exercise, but not at both. Unless the
Nonqualified Option has a "readily ascertainable fair market value" at the date
of grant, the optionee recognizes no income on the date of grant and recognizes
ordinary compensation income when the Nonqualified Option is exercised to the
extent of the difference between the fair market value of the Common Stock at
the time of exercise of the Nonqualified Option and the exercise price paid by
the optionee.

-8-

Stock Awards. The recipient of a stock award will generally recognize
------------
ordinary income in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the
shares on the date the shares are freely tradeable and no longer subject to a
substantial risk of forfeiture over the amount paid for the shares, if any.
However, the recipient may elect to recognize income based on the fair market
value of the shares on the date the shares are awarded rather than when the
shares are freely tradeable and no longer subject to a substantial risk of
forfeiture. The shares will be deemed to have been acquired on the date ordinary
income is recognized and will have a tax basis equal to their fair market value
on that date. Any gain or loss generated after the shares are freely tradable
and no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, or after an election
to recognize ordinary income on the date the shares are awarded, will be taxed
to the recipient as capital gain or loss.

Company Deductions. The Company generally is entitled to a deduction for
------------------
federal income tax purposes at the same time and in the same amount that the
participant recognizes ordinary income, to the extent that such income is
considered reasonable compensation under the Code. Deductions may be limited
with respect to awards granted to certain executive officers if the awards do
not qualify as "performance-based compensation".

Amendment to the Plan

On February 26, 2001, the Board of Directors approved an amendment to
the Plan to reserve an additional 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock under the
Plan, increasing the number of shares reserved for grants under the Plan from
1,000,000 shares to 2,000,000 shares. The number of shares subject to the Plan
is being increased to provide for awards in future years. The Company intends to
award grants to directors, officers, employees, consultants and advisors in
order to provide incentives to such individuals to focus on critical long-range
objectives of the Company and to encourage the attraction and retention of such
individuals. As of March 9, 2001, options awarded pursuant to the Plan for
722,000 shares are outstanding. These options were issued at or above fair
market value of the Common Stock on the date of grant. All options granted
expire from a range of 90 days following termination of the optionee's service
to 2 years following termination of the optionee's service, not to exceed ten
years from the date of grant. The market value of the securities underlying the
options as of March 9, 2001 is $2.25 per share of Common Stock. If the entire
amount of 2,000,000 shares that have been authorized under the Plan were issued
thereunder, such shares would constitute approximately 10.27% of the Common
Stock outstanding as of March 9, 2001. The approval of the amendment to the Plan
requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the Common Stock
present in person or by proxy at a meeting at which a quorum is present.
Abstentions are counted in the tabulation of votes entitled to be cast and
therefore have the effect of a vote against the proposal, whereas broker
non-votes are not counted and have no effect on the vote.

The Company expects to file an S-8 Registration Statement by June 30,
2001 in order to register the 2,000,000 shares being reserved under the Plan.

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote "FOR" the proposal to
amend the Plan.

-9-

PROPOSAL THREE - RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF
INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

The Company's Board of Directors has appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPPWC to act as the Company's
independent public accountants for the fiscal year ending December 31, 20002001
subject to ratification by the stockholders. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPPWC has served as the Company's
independent public accountants since 1995. A representative of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPPWC is expected
to be present at the Annual Meeting with the opportunity to make a statement if
such representative so desires and to respond to appropriate questions.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote "FOR" ratification of this
appointment. Stockholder ratification of the appointment of auditors is not required
under the laws of the State of Delaware, under which the Company is
incorporated, but the Board of Directors has determined to ascertain the
position of the stockholders on the appointment. The Board of Directors will
reconsider the appointment of PWC if it is not ratified by the stockholders.

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote "FOR" the proposal to
ratify the appointment of PWC.

Fees Paid to Independent Auditors

Audit Fees
----------

The Company expects to be billed aggregate fees of approximately $71,000
by PWC for professional services rendered with respect to the audit of its
financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 and the reviews
of the financial statements included in its Form 10-Qs for the same fiscal year.

Financial Information Systems Design and Implementation Fees
------------------------------------------------------------

PWC did not bill the Company for any professional services for financial
information systems design or implementation services for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2000.

All Other Fees
--------------
The Company expects to be billed aggregate fees by PWC of approximately
$15,000 for services, other than the services referred to above, rendered for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000.

The Audit Committee has determined that PWC's provision of non-audit
services to the Company is compatible with the maintenance of PWC's
independence.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The executive officers of the Company (other than Jeffrey W. Jones,
Chief Executive Officer, whose business background is described under "Election
of Directors") are as follows:

-10-
Keith G. Bateman, 47,48, joined the Company in 1999 as Vice President of
Global Sales. Mr. Bateman held key executive positions with the international
and domestic divisions of HGM Medical Lasers, a Salt Lake City-based
manufacturer of medical lasers utilized in ophthalmologic, dental and anesthetic
applications, from 1994 through 1998. He previously spent several years in
sales, marketing and management in the computer industry.

Ioana Rizoiu, 36,37, has served as Vice President of Research and
Development since 1997. Ms. Rizoiu, who joined the Company in 1992 as a
physicist, played a significant role in the development of the Company's prior
laser-based products and its present HydroKinetic(TM) technology. In 1995, she
was promoted to Director of Research and Development, where her responsibilities
included the design and development of the delivery system utilized to transport
the HydroKinetic(TM) technology to the target tissue. She has also served as
project manager for the LaserBrush(TM) toothbrush since 1995.

Stephen R. Tartamella, 46,47, has been Vice President of
Finance/Administration and Chief Financial Officer since 1995. Mr. Tartamella
served as a financial consultant from 1992 until joining the Company in 1994.
From 1990 to 1992, Mr. Tartamella served as Vice President of
Finance/Administration and Chief Financial Officer of Taylor Dunn Manufacturing,
a manufacturer of electric and gas powered utility carts.

Officers of the Company serve at the discretion of the Board of
Directors, subject to the terms of any employment agreement with the Company.

5
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table

The following table provides compensation information with respect to
the Chief Executive Officer and the only other executive officer of the Company
whose salary exceeded $100,000 in 1999fiscal year 2000 (the "Named Executive
Officers") for the periods indicated.

Long-term
-------------------
Annual Compensation Compensation
-------------------- --------------------------------- ------------

Name and Fiscal Other Annual Securities
Underlying
Principal Position Year Salary Compensation Options (#)Underlying
------------------ ---------- ------ ------------ -----------------------Option (#)
-----------

Jeffrey W. Jones 1999 $220,000 $40,000 100,0002000 $240,000 -- 100,000/(1)/
Chief Executive 1999 220,000 40,000 100,000/(2)/
Officer 1998 20,000 -- 507,000

Officer (1)
Keith G. Bateman 2000 $142,531 -- 75,000/(3)/
Vice President, 1999 125,068 -- 175,000
Vice President,175,000/(4)/
Global Sales

(1) Options for 100,000 shares were cancelled on 12/29/00 and options for an
additional 100,000 shares were granted on the same date.

-11-

(2)

_____________

(1) Mr. Jones was elected Chief Executive OfficerOptions for 100,000 shares were cancelled on 12/15/99 and options for an
additional 100,000 shares were granted on the same date.

(3) Options for 75,000 shares were cancelled on 12/29/00 and options for an
additional 75,000 shares were granted on the same date.

(4) Options for 50,000 shares were cancelled on 12/22/99 and options for 75,000
were issued on 12/22/99.

Option Grants in November 1998. See
"Employment and Severance Agreements" below. Other Annual Compensation for
Mr. Jones in 1999 represents reimbursement of relocation costs.

(2) Mr. Bateman joined the Company in January 1999. Fiscal Year 1999 Option Grants2000

Shown below is information regarding stock options granted to the Named
Executive Officers during 1999.fiscal year 2000.

Number of Potential Realizable Value
Securities
% of Total OptionsValue at Assumed
Options Annual Rates Underlyingof
Number of Granted to Exercise of Stock Price
OptionsSecurities Employees Exercise Appreciation for
Underlying in Fiscal Price Per Expiration Appreciation forOption Term (1)
--------------------
Name Options Granted (1) Fiscal Year Share Date Option Term (2)
- --------------------- ----------------- ------------------- ----------- ------------- ----------------------------
5% 10%
---- --------------------- --------------- ---------- -------- ---------- ------- ---------

Jeffrey W. Jones 100,000 (3) 22% $2.125(2) 18.15% 2.12500 12/15/29/10 $133,875 $337,875$62,377 $225,187

Keith G. Bateman 100,000 (4) 22%75,000 (3) 13.61% 2.15625 1/08/09 135,844 342,844
75,000 (5) 16% 2.15625 12/11/29/10 101,883 257,133$44,441 $166,546

_____________

(1) The exercise price equaled the fair market value on the grant date. The
Compensation Committee has the authority to modify the terms of outstanding
options, including the exercise price and vesting schedule.

(2) These values were determined in accordance with rules suggestedpromulgated by the
SEC and are not intended to forecast the prices at which the Company's Common
Stock could trade in the future. The actual realized value will depend
on the amount by which the sales price of the shares exceeds the
exercise price.

(3)(2) These options vest as to 50,000 shares if the Company has fiscal year 2000
revenues of at least $12 millionimmediately and as to 12,500 shares (up to a total of
50,000 additional shares) for each $1 million of revenues in excess of $12
million in fiscal year 2000. These options were granted to replace 100,000
options granted in 1998 at the same exercise price(50,000 of which were cancelled
because performance vesting requirements were not achieved.

(4) 50,000 of these optionsto vest ratably over a six-month period. Vesting of
the remaining 50,000 options was dependent on the Company achieving
revenues of $12 million in fiscal year 1999. Because the vesting condition
was not achieved, the latter 50,000 options were cancelled and replaced by
the options described in Note (5) at the same exercise price.

(5) These options vest as to 50,000 shares if the Company has fiscal year 2000
revenuesupon consolidated earnings of at
least $12 million for fiscal 2000 and as50,000 of which were to 6,250 shares (up to a totalvest at
the rate of 25,000 additional shares)12,500 for each $1 million ofin audited consolidated revenues
in excess ofthat exceeded $12 million infor fiscal year 2000.

19992000) but which were
voluntarily cancelled at 12/29/00 as performance criteria were not
achieved.

(3) These options vest immediately and were granted to replace 75,000
options (50,000 of which were to vest upon consolidated earnings of at
least $12 million for fiscal 2000 and 25,000 of which were to vest at
the rate of 6,250 for each $1 million in audited consolidated revenues
that exceeded $12 million for fiscal year 2000) but which were
voluntarily cancelled at 12/29/00 as performance criteria were not
achieved.

-12-

Aggregated Option Exercises in Fiscal Year 2000 and Fiscal Year-End Option
Values

Shown below is information regarding unexercised stock options held by
the Named Executive Officers at December 31, 1999.2000. No stock options were
exercised by the Named Executive Officers during 1999.fiscal 2000.

Number of Securities Underlying
Unexercised Options at Value of Unexercised In-the-Money
Name Fiscal Year-End Options at Fiscal Year-End (1)
- ------------------ ------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ ---------------------------------
Exercisable Unexercisable Exercisable Unexercisable
--------------------- -------------------- ---------------------- ------------------------------ ------------- ------------ --------------

Jeffrey W. Jones 176,000 331,000 $99,000 $186,188419,000 88,000 -- --
Keith G. Bateman 50,000 75,000 26,563 39,844125,000 -- -- --

__________________________________

(1) Represents the difference between the aggregate market value on December
31, 19992000 ($2.68751.6875 per share) and the aggregate exercise price of options
that had an exercise price less than such market value.

Employment and Severance Agreements

The Company employs Jeffrey W. Jones as President and Chief Executive
Officer pursuant to the terms of an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement
dated December 18, 1998.1998 and further amended in January 2000. Under the
agreement, Mr. Jones is entitled to (a) a base annual salary of $220,000,$240,000, and
(b) a bonus for the period ended December 31,
1999 equal to 10% of his base salary paid through such period if the Company's
consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 1999 are at least
$12,000,000, and (c) incentive compensation for each year subsequent yearto 1999 equal to 4% of
pre-tax net income up to $1,000,000 and 2% of pre-tax net income in excess of
$1,000,000, with pre-tax net income computed before provision for such incentive
compensation. Mr. Jones was also granted ten-year options to purchase 507,000
shares of the Company's Common Stock at an exercise price of $2.125 per share (fair market
value on the grant date), 100,000 of which were subsequently cancelled. The
remaining 407,000 shares vest at the rate of 11,000 shares per month. An additional 50,000 shares were to vest if the
Company achieved fiscal year 1999 revenues of at least $12,000,000 and an
additional 50,000 shares were

to vest on any date through May 31, 2000 that the closing price of the Company's
Common Stock equaled or exceeded $8.00 per share for 20 consecutive trading
days. In December 1999, the Company cancelled the two 50,000 share increments of
this option and issued a new option to Mr. Jones at the same exercise price
(which was at least the fair market value on the grant date) on the terms
described in Note (3) under "Fiscal Year 1999 Option Grants" above. If Mr.
Jones' employment is terminated by the Company other than for cause, the 407,000
options will continue to vest for the longer of the balance of the calendar year
in which the termination occurs or six months following termination. The Company
agreed to reimburse Mr. Jones his reasonable relocation costs up to $40,000.

The initial term of Mr. Jones' agreement ends on December 31, 2001, but
his employment will continue on the terms existing at that time until terminated
on at least 90 days prior notice by either party. The Company may immediately
terminate the agreement at any time for cause, which generally includes
conviction for a crime involving moral turpitude or a felony, repeated failure
to perform in accordance with the Board of Directors' instructions, willful and
material breach of the agreement which is not cured within 15 business days of
notice thereof, or the commission of an act of fraud or dishonesty in connection
with his employment. If the Company terminates Mr. Jones' employment prior to
December 31, 2001 other than for cause, Mr. Jones will be entitled to severance
pay in lieu of other salary and bonus payments in an

-13-
amount equal to up to 12 times his base monthly salary, depending on the term
remaining under the agreement. The Company has also agreed to indemnify Mr.
Jones to the maximum extent permitted by Delaware law.

In connection with the Company's employment of Keith G. Bateman as Vice
President, Global Sales, the Company agreed that if the Company is acquired or
merged, Mr. Bateman will be entitled to severance equal to his previous nine
months compensation (including commissions and bonus) unless the successor
company offers Mr. Bateman a one-year employment agreement on at least the same
compensation as he is then receiving.

REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEECompensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee sets and administers the policies governing
the Company's compensation program, including its stock option plans. The
Committee discusses and considers executive compensation matters and makes its
decisions, subject to review by the Company's Board of Directors.

The goals of the Company's executive compensation program are to attract
and retain executive officers who will strive for excellence and to motivate
those individuals to achieve superior performance by providing them with rewards
for assisting the Company in meeting targets regarding revenues, profitability
and technology development. When establishing overall compensation, the
committeeCompensation Committee takes into consideration the amounts paid to management
of companies with similar business structure, size, location and stage of
development as the Company. The compensation of the Company's executive officers
consists of base salary, discretionary bonus and stock options granted under the
Company's stock option plans.

Jeffrey W. Jones, Chief Executive Officer, is compensated in accordance
with the terms of an employment agreement which is summarized under "Executive
Compensation - Employment and Severance Agreements." In addition to base salary,
Mr. Jones is entitled to a bonus and incentive compensation if the Company achieves certain
revenue and net income targets. To provide Mr. Jones was alsowith incentive for
performance in fiscal year 2000, options previously granted 507,000to Mr. Jones were
canceled and replaced with 100,000 options ofwith the same exercise price but
which 100,000 options were to vest only ifbased on the Company achieved certain revenue and stock price targets.achievement of at least $12,000,000 in revenues
in fiscal year 2000. In 2000, the 100,000 options so granted did not vest.
Although those performance conditions were not met, the Committee determined
that given the Company's performance during 2000 coupled with general economic
conditions, the Committee would grant options for an additional 100,000 shares,
which are immediately exercisable, to replace those that did not vest.
Accordingly, the Committee believes that a significant portion of Mr. Jones' compensation is tied
to Company performance and that his stock options align his interests
with those of the Company's stockholders. The Committee believes that the
compensation package provided to Mr. Jones was necessary to attract Mr. Jones in
a competitive environment for executive personnel with experience in the
medical/dental laser industry.

In 1999, Mr. Jones did not earn a bonus and 100,000 of the 507,000 options
granted to him in 1998 did not vest because the required performance targets
were not achieved. To provide Mr. Jones with incentive for performance in
fiscal year 2000, the unvested 100,000 options were canceled and replaced with
100,000 options with the same exercise price but which vest based on the
achievement of at least $12,000,000 in revenues in fiscal year 2000.

Base salaries of executive officers other than the Chief Executive
Officer are based upon (1) the officer's position, experience and tenure with
the Company; (2) industry and comparable company compensation surveys; (3) an
evaluation of the executive officer's performance; and (4) judgments as to the
expected future contributions of the executive officer.

The Compensation Committee may award discretionary bonuses based on the
Company's results of operations and financial position and an evaluation of the
performance of each executive officer in such officer's areas of responsibility
and each executive officer's respective contribution to the Company's operating
performance. The Company's annual operating plan is

-14-
the principal point of reference utilized by the Compensation Committee to
determine whether any particular officer's contribution to achieving or
exceeding the operating plan merits a bonus award. No bonuses were awarded for
1999.

9
fiscal year 2000.

During each fiscal year, the Compensation Committee considers the
desirability of option grants to the Company's executive officers under the
Company's stock option plans. The Compensation Committee believes that stock
options encourage the attainment of strategic goals over time and align employee
and stockholder interests. In determining the grants of stock options to
executive officers in 1999,2000, the Compensation Committee reviewed the
recommendations of the Board of Directors and the Chief Executive Officer
regarding individual awards for
officers other than the Chief Executive Officer,and employees, and considered the past and anticipated
responsibilities, specific assignments, strategic and operational goals,
performance and contributions of each such executive officer and employee, as well as the
number of options previously granted to such officer or employee and the number
of shares subject to options that had vested and would vest in the future.

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally limits the
corporate tax deduction to $1,000,000 for compensation paid to certain executive
officers of publicly-held companies unless the compensation qualifies as
"performance-
based"performance-based compensation" under that section. Stock options and stock
awards under the Company's option plans do not qualify as performance-based
compensation. Accordingly, if in any year the exercise of options causes an
executive officer's total compensation to exceed $1,000,000 in that year, the
amount of the excess will not be deductible by the Company. The Compensation
Committee does not have any plans at this time to qualify the Company's
compensation plans so that they are exempt from the deductibility limits of
Section 162(m).

The Compensation CommitteeTHE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Federico Pignatelli

George V. d'Arbeloff

COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16 OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

Section 16-15-

STOCK PERFORMANCE

The following graph presents a comparison of cumulative total
stockholder returns for the five years ended December 31, 2000 for the Common
Stock, The Nasdaq SmallCap Market, and The Nasdaq Medical Devices, Instruments
and Supplies, Manufacturers and Distributors Index. The following graph assumes
the investment of $100 on December 31, 1995 and the reinvestment of all
dividends, if any. The total return performance shown on the graph is not
necessarily indicative of future total return performance of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Company's
directors, executive officers and greater than 10% stockholders to file reports
of ownership (Form 3) and changes in ownership (Forms 4 and 5) with the SEC and
to furnish the Company with copies of all such forms which they file with the
SEC.

The Company believes that during 1999 all required reports were timely
filed by its directors, executives officers and greater than 10% stockholders
except that Jeffrey W. Jones and Keith G. Bateman each filed a late Form 3. In
making the foregoing disclosures, the Company has relied solely on its review of
copies of forms filed by such persons with the SEC.

Total Return To Shareholder's
(Dividends reinvested monthly)Common Stock.

[GRAPH APPEARS HERE]

ANNUAL RETURN PERCENTAGE
YearsINDEXED RETURNS
Year Ending
Company / Base
Period
Company/Index Dec95 Dec96 Dec97 Dec98 Dec99 - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY INC 250.00 14.29 -17.20 -35.84 26.49
S&P SMALLCAP 600 INDEX 29.96 21.32 25.58 -1.31 12.40
NASDAQ MED DEVICES 51.76 -6.33 14.56 12.02 21.65

INDEXED RETURNS
Base Years Ending
Period
Company / Index Dec94 Dec95 Dec96 Dec97 Dec98 Dec99Dec00
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY INC 100 350.00 400.00 331.20 212.50 268.80114.29 94.63 60.71 76.80 48.23
S&P SMALLCAP 600 INDEX 100 129.96 157.67 198.01 195.42 219.66121.32 152.36 150.37 169.02 188.96
NASDAQ MED DEVICES 100 151.76 142.16 162.86 182.44 221.9493.67 106.88 119.19 144.35 148.90

-16-

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

Any stockholder intending to submit to the Company a proposal for
inclusion in the Company's Proxy Statement and proxy for the 2001 Annual Meeting2002 annual meeting
must submit such proposal so that it is received by the Company no later than
December 24, 2000,November 23, 2001, and such proposal must otherwise comply with Rule 14a-8 under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

If a stockholder submits a proposal atfor the Company's Annual Meetingannual meeting of
Stockholdersstockholders to be held in 20012002 other than in accordance with Rule 14a-8 and
that stockholder does not provide notice of his proposal to the Company by
March
7, 2001,February 5, 2002, the holders of any proxy solicited by the Company's Board of Directors
for use at that meeting will have discretionary authority to vote on that
proposal without a description of that proposal in the Company's proxy statement
for that meeting.

DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY

While the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders calls for the
transaction of such other business as may properly come before the meeting, the
Board of Directors has no knowledge of any matters to be presented for action by
the stockholders other than as set forth above. The enclosed proxy gives
discretionary authority, however, in the event any additional matters should be
presented.

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

A COPY OF THE COMPANY'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 19992000 (WITHOUT EXHIBITS)
ACCOMPANIES THIS PROXY STATEMENT.

12-17-

EXHIBIT A

BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY, INC.

AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

February 26,200l

The Audit Committee will assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its
oversight responsibilities. The Audit Committee will review the financial
reporting process, the system of internal controls, the audit process and the
Company's process for monitoring compliance with laws and regulations . In
performing its duties, the Audit Committee will maintain effective working
relationships with the Board of Directors, management and the internal and
external auditors.

The following sets forth in detail the membership requirements,
structure and responsibilities of the Audit Committee.

MEMBERSHIP REQUIREMENTS
- -----------------------

1. The Audit Committee shall be appointed by the Board of Directors and
shall be comprised solely of independent directors. Each member of the
Audit Committee shall be free from any relationship that, in the opinion
of the Board of Directors, would interfere with the exercise of
independent judgment as an Audit Committee member.

2. The members of the Audit Committee shall meet the following experience
requirements: each shall be able to read and understand fundamental
financial statements, including a company's balance sheet, income
statement, and cash flow statement or will become able to do so within a
reasonable period of time after his or her appointment to the Audit
Committee. Additionally, at least one member of the Audit Committee must
have past employment experience in finance or accounting, requisite
professional certification in accounting, or any other comparable
experience or background which results in that individual's financial
sophistication.

3. The Board of Directors may, under exceptional and limited circumstances,
appoint one director who is not independent and is not a current
employee or an immediate family member of a current employee, if the
Board determines that membership on the Audit Committee by that
individual is required by the best interests of the Company and its
stockholders.

STRUCTURE
- ---------

1. The Audit Committee shall consist of three directors.

2. Unless a Chairperson is elected by the full Board of Directors, the
members of the Audit Committee may designate a Chairperson by majority
vote.

3. The Audit Committee shall meet formally twice a year or more frequently
as circumstances may dictate. The Audit Committee shall meet privately
(without members of management present) with the independent auditors at
its discretion to discuss any matters that the Audit Committee or the
independent auditors believe should be discussed.

RESPONSIBILITIES
- ----------------

Independent Auditors
- --------------------

It shall be the responsibility of the Audit Committee to assist the
Board of Directors by providing oversight on matters pertaining to the
independence and performance of the independent auditors and to recommend
annually the independent auditors to be selected by the Board of Directors. The
independent auditors are ultimately accountable to the Audit Committee and the
Board of Directors as representatives of the stockholders of the Company.

In carrying out these responsibilities, the Audit Committee shall:

1. Receive annually from the independent auditors a formal written
statement delineating all relationships between the auditors and the
Company in accordance with Independence Standards Board Standard 1.

2. Actively engage in a dialogue with the independent auditors with respect
to any disclosed relationship or services performed by the independent
auditors that might impact the objectivity and independence of the
auditors and take, or recommend that the full Board of Directors take,
appropriate action to oversee and satisfy itself annually of the
independence of the independent auditors.

3. Receive annually from the independent auditors an engagement letter and
review the fees and other significant compensation to be paid to the
independent auditors .

4. Meet with the independent auditors to discuss the proposed scope,
staffing, reliance upon management and general audit approach of the
year-end audit.

5. Recommend to the Board of Directors, the selection and, where
appropriate, replacement of the outside auditor (subject to the approval
of the Board of Directors).

Financial Reporting
- -------------------

It shall be the responsibility of the Audit Committee to assist the
Board of Directors by providing oversight on matters pertaining to the
accounting, financial reporting, internal control and audit activities of the
Company.

In carrying out these responsibilities, the Audit Committee shall:

1. Review with management and internal and external auditors significant
risks and exposures and the plans to minimize such risks.

2. Review, and communicate with the independent auditors about, the annual
financial statements to be included in the Form 10-K and the quarterly
financial statements to be included in each Form 10-Q, after the
independent auditors have reviewed and/or audited such statements and
prior to filing such reports with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

3. Meet with the independent auditors, following the conclusion of the
year-end audit, to discuss the audited financial statements to be
included in the Company's annual report to stockholders on Form 10-K,
including discussion of certain matters required to be communicated to
audit committees in accordance with AICPA Statement of Accounting
Standards No. 61, as may be modified or supplemented ("SAS 61").

a. Discuss and consider the independent auditors' judgments about
the quality and appropriateness of the Company's accounting
principles as applied in its financial reporting in accordance
with SAS 61, as may be modified or supplemented.

b. Discuss with management and the independent auditors any
significant issues regarding the Company's internal controls,
including any significant findings prepared by the independent
auditors with respect thereto.

C. Inquire into any changes in the Company's accounting principles
and practices and the effect of any changes in accounting
standards that may materially affect the Company's financial
reporting practices.

d. Advise the Board of Directors of the Company whether, based on
its reviews and discussions and its assessment of the independent
auditors' independence, the Audit Committee recommends that the
audited financial statements be included in the Company's annual
report to stockholders on Form 10-K.

Other Duties
- ------------

In addition to the foregoing responsibilities, the Audit Committee
shall:

1. Prepare annually a report to stockholders to be included in the
Company's proxy statement as required by SEC regulations.

2. Review and reassess the adequacy of this Charter at least annually, make
recommendations to the Board of Directors, as conditions dictate, to
update the Charter, and direct that the Charter be included as an
exhibit to the Company's proxy statement at least every three years in
accordance with SEC regulations.

3. Comply with any SEC, NASDAQ or other applicable regulatory agency rules
relating to the duties of the Audit Committee and content of the Audit
Committee Charter.

4. Perform any other activities consistent with this Charter, the Company's
by-laws, and governing law as the Audit Committee or the Board of
Directors deems necessary or appropriate, including causing an
investigation to be made into any matter brought to the

attention of the Audit Committee within the scope of its duties, with
power to retain outside counsel or consultants if, in its judgment, that
is appropriate.

[PROXY]

BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
981 Calle Amanecer
San Clemente, California 92673

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The undersigned hereby appoints Federico Pignatelli and Stephen R.
Tartamella, and each of them, as attorneys and proxies of the undersigned, each
with the power to appoint his substitute, and hereby authorizes each of them to
represent and vote as designated below, all the shares of Common Stock of
BioLase Technology, Inc. (the "Company") held of record by the undersigned on
March 31, 2000,5, 2001, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 23,
2000,3, 2001,
or any adjournments thereof.

1.Election1. Election of Directors

[_] FOR all nominees listed below [_] WITHHOLD
nominees listed AUTHORITY to vote
below (except as marked to the contrary for all nominees marked to the listed below
contrary
below)

FEDERICO PIGNATELLI, GEORGE V. D'ARBELOFF, WILLIAM A. OWENS, JEFFREY W. JONES

(Instruction: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee,
strike a line through the nominee's name above.)

2. To approve the amendment to the 1998 Stock Option Plan increasing the
authorized number of shares from 1,000,000 shares to 2,000,000 shares.

[_] FOR [_] AGAINST [_] ABSTAIN

3. To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company's
independent public accountants for the year ending December 31, 2000.2001.

[_] FOR [_] AGAINST [_] ABSTAIN

3. In their discretion, the Proxies are each authorized to vote upon such
other business as may properly come before the meeting.

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE COMPANY'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS.
WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED
HEREIN BY THE UNDERSIGNED STOCKHOLDER. IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS
PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR ALL PROPOSALS.

Please sign exactly as name appears below. When
shares are held by joint tenants, both should sign.
When signing as an attorney, as executor,
administrator, trustee or guardian, please give
full title to such. If a corporation, please sign
in full corporate name, by President or other
authorized officer. If a partnership, please sign
in partnership name by authorized person.

Dated: , 2000
____________________________________2001

__________________________________________________
Signature

______________________________________________________________________________________
(Signature if held jointly)